Ain't It Cool News (www.aintitcool.com)
Movie News

Another blast at MISSION TO MARS

Well it looks like Father Geek made the right decision last night. I had a FREE pass to a local preview screening of M2M for yesterday evening. I chose to help sister_satan666@yahoo.com (Harry's sibling) move her impressive near complete ET collection and her fine animation cel collection out of Geek Headquarters instead. Now that was entertainment of a far superior level, outstanding images and intense drama. (will she leave anything, perhaps the TinkerBell cel, or KOKO the Clown) Buuuuut Noooooo, the sharp little femme fatale took it all, as her kind always do. Rats!!! She remembered Spielburg's "Nocturnal Fear" ET2 scriptment. Wait a minute what's that you're hauling out the door, not the oil of the Fairy Princess. That's mine! Falk the watercolorist gave that to me before your Mom and I got married in 1970. So what if it did hang in your bedroom at the ranch all those years, she stole it from me during the divorce. Not tears, no, anything but that. OK take it, we need the room anyhow. The Horror... The Horror! Yes my evening turned out far more exciting for staying home, just read on geeks, if you dare, read on...

Hey Father Geek, I caught a screening with some friends last night. Beforehand, we actually discussed how we were sorta bummed because, while the trailer was pretty damn cool, that item on your site about the NYU screening definitely gave us pause.

I'm no fan of pretentious, rarified cinema. Hell, I still think Lost in Space is an enjoyable mess of a film. Mission to Mars, on the other hand ... well, pejoratives very nearly fail me. I won't even attempt coherence. This is just a litany of the film's awfulness.

During the screening, my friends and I just kept staring at each other incredulously. I mean, let's begin with the acting. Porno-film bad. MTV-Music-Awards-parody bad. Characters speaking to each other with an utter lack of conviction, sincerity, or even, HELL, eye contact or connection. That terrible opening sequence at the barbecue with its three disjointed, meaningless "single" takes, that weird spiel in the driveway where Don Cheadle just runs on for about five minutes of dry expository dialogue ("First your wife died ... man oh man ... then you lost the Mars mission ... man oh man ... then blah blah blah) looking almost DIRECTLY INTO THE CAMERA! And Gary Sinise? What a stench! All he did was crack a crooked smile every now and then. That was his character trait! And let's consider Kim Delaney's bizarre, thankless, hammy participation as his deceased wife ... I have to assume most of her scenes were edited out, because her billing was awfully high for someone who only appeared in a cheesy video flashback for about three minutes.

The shameless lack of authenticity: Apparently, thirty years from now, NASA will be manned solely by an old man with a pot belly and a bunch of college interns. Where was Mission Control?! The media?! Earth?! There were hardly any people in this movie! Also, Jerry O'Connell is supposed to be an astronaut? Wasn't his character trait, like, being afraid of the dark or something? Or Tim Robbins and his wife, and those bizarrely unprofessional "We'd rather fuck than respond to a red alert" or "Mars is nigh, shall we waltz?" scenes? Also, is it just me, or did that little "meteor" that got lodged in the ship's view screen look an awful lot like something that came out of a colonial musket? Jeez.

The music! Groan. Lifted from sitcoms (think Comet-the-dog mischief on The Brady Bunch) and The Parent Trap, perhaps? Strange, pervasive, intrusive, and wildly inappropriate! Those little patriotic riffs during the "communion" with the alien? Grimace.

The Alien: Made out of computer-generated chintz, I guess? And if you were an alien race trying to be helpful, would you leave an obscure puzzle without any instructions? I'd think at least some sort of interplanetary flight safety manual-type mural would be helpful. Also, I guess the planetarium was holographic, but the alien entity was ... some sort of ... magic? Because the ass-tronauts held hands with it and stuff, and then there was that lovely aforementioned little patriotic riff over the soundtrack (intrepid!).

When Gary Sinise decides to forsake humanity, all Don Cheadle can manage is a HAND SHAKE?! Dude, he saved your life, and you've been alone for eight months and you're never gonna see him again. Methinks this calls for an open-mouth kiss, at least. It definitely would have been in keeping with the film's already bizarre anything-goes tone.

And yeah, when my friends and I saw the "point of no return" warning on the girl-astronaut's suit-screen during the space-walk, we were like, Who manufactured the suit? ACME by way of Warner Bros.? It was a Wile E. Coyote moment, to be sure. I could have done without that gross and exploitative Tim Robbins flash-freeze, however. Yuck. Although we were sorta expecting something to shatter his head, and were disappointed when that didn't happen. It was that kind of movie, after all.

Incidentally, my favorite scene was when the alien shed a tear, because by then the film had already become one of the ten worst films I've ever seen, so I was really beginning to enjoy the profound excess of dime-store sentiment. And that flashback montage as Gary blasts off? Straight outta Baby Geniuses.

No need to conceal my name. I don't really wanna work for Disney anyway.

R.

--

Raza Syed

Readers Talkback
comments powered by Disqus
    + Expand All
  • March 7, 2000 12:36 PM CST

    No

    by darthpsychotic

    woe to you o' earth and sea, for the devil sends the beast, let him who hath understanding, reckon the number of the beast, for it is a HUMAN NUMBER, its number, SIX-HUNDRED AND SIXTY SIX, 666!!

  • March 7, 2000 12:42 PM CST

    PORNO-BAD??!! WOW!!

    by Baron Karza

    Thats one of the BEST comments I've heard about this movie!! LT. DAN WHAT THE FUCK??!!

  • March 7, 2000 12:43 PM CST

    I'm First!

    by mistervoice

    Who's Tim Robbins? Name sounds familiar

  • March 7, 2000 12:54 PM CST

    This settles it

    by Oliver Platt

    Well I guess I'll be saving $7.00 this week. I had my suspicions about this one...after all, any movie based on a DisneyLand amusement park ride can't be good.

  • March 7, 2000 12:55 PM CST

    hey Darth...

    by SCOTT1458

    That's from an Iron Maidden song right? Unless I missed something...why is sister satan moving out of geek headquarters?

  • March 7, 2000 12:58 PM CST

    Sounds about like Armageddon

    by xrae

    Is M2M a Disney movie? Wasn't Armageddon a Disney (or Touchstone) movie? No surprises here.

  • March 7, 2000 1:00 PM CST

    This review?

    by Prankster

    This review! Is kind of incoherent? Not that the film might not be bad! But this guy doesn't seem very credible? I especially find it hard to believe! That Don Cheadle, Gary Sinise and Tim Robbins? Deliver "porno-bad" performances! And this guy? Liked "Lost in Space"! And apperantly has no idea? How to punctuate a sentence! It's called a complete clause? It contains a subject, object and predicate! Try to use it next time?

  • March 7, 2000 1:02 PM CST

    Thanks for only obtusely refering to the movie...

    by Funny Ha Ha

    I now understand how much Syed disliked this movie and why, without feeling like I know the entire plot. I believe that's what AllThumbs has been after, and I too appreciate it. As for M2M, golly, can it really suck this bad? I mean, really? This is some very strong criticism: according to this reviewer the acting, directing, plot, concept, costumes, special effects and music are all terrible. I guess I am going to need a STRONG counter-review (fourth opinion) to justify risking the cash on this one...

  • March 7, 2000 1:06 PM CST

    Ya pay peanuts...

    by Kraven

    If Disney bothered to pay top dollar to their screenwriters they might end up with a top dollar movie instead of one that makes a gazillion dollars but makes the studio execs look like second-rate carny touts.

  • March 7, 2000 1:16 PM CST

    And the cheese flows, continually, ever flowing cheese

    by RipReaver

    Yet this guy liked lost in space, the most embarassing piece of crap ive ever seen. so people, WHAT DOES qualify for a shitty movie. if this movie is worse then lost in space then im going to be stunned prone by how bad this is. hey, i hope its that bad, cause the only thing more fun then a great movie is a really really really bad one. what he said though about not showing anyone, nasa, reporters anything. YOU GOTTA show dudes invloved to give a sense of something big happening. oh well, crap everywhere.

  • March 7, 2000 1:17 PM CST

    I'm not normally religious, but save me Superman

    by Astro Pud

    I saw this in a movie about a bus that had to SPEED around a city, keeping its SPEED over fifty, and if its SPEED dropped, it would explode. I think it was called, "The Bus That Couldn't Slow Down."

  • March 7, 2000 1:17 PM CST

    Brian DePalma

    by Gilda Mundson

    Maybe this is my youth speaking, but I have never seen a good Brian DePalma movie, Carrie excepted. Mission Impossible sucked, Snake Eyes sucked...why does this guy keep getting work? Did he ever show promise? Enlighten me.

  • March 7, 2000 1:20 PM CST

    A dissapointing year for Sci-fi

    by Stephen Dedalus

    So far, we've had SUPERNOVA, which was so bad that the director removed his name from the credits, PITCH BLACK, which was so-so at best, and now this. And we still have to sit through that animated film that Fox has coming out (I've already forgotten the name). Is it me, or do eacho of these movies look like they were whipped together within six months time to follow up on the heels of THE MATRIX and TPM? In any case, I still maintain that GATTACA is the best science-fiction film in recent years. It didn't have any big, ugly, overblown effects, just a heckuva involving story, great acting, and tight direction. See it if you haven't.

  • March 7, 2000 1:22 PM CST

    what planet are they from?

    by Mike the Bill

    Ok, if I was going to spend $8 gazilion dallars on something, I think that I would at least pretend to do it right. How can major studios spend so much money on something and still end up with something worthless?

  • March 7, 2000 1:24 PM CST

    Porno Bad and Parent Trap music?

    by All Thumbs

    Please, don't insult porn and "The Parent Trap." Ok, now I have to see this movie just to see HOW bad it is.

  • March 7, 2000 1:27 PM CST

    RE: Gilda Mundson

    by Mike D

    It IS your youth, my friend....Brian DePalma in fact DOESN'T suck. CARLITO'S WAY, THE UNTOUCHABLES, BLOW OUT, RAISING CAIN. I wouldn't start labeling DePalma a Scorsese or a Spielberg, but he doesn't posess that bad a track-record of movies to say the least.

  • March 7, 2000 1:34 PM CST

    Its all crap

    by RipReaver

    I hate to rehash my mummy posting..but....ITS ALL CRAP, CRAP CRAP CRAP, CRAP, CRAP, SILLY STUPID DUMBASS JAR JAR HOLLYWOOD ONE LINER CLICHED COMEDY RELIEF SOULLESS THOUGHTLESS MTV LOVING AUDIENCE ASSFUCKING DEVLIN AND EMMERICH INFESTED HIT LAME ASS TOP TEN SHEEP FOLLOWING SHEEP FUCKING TRENDY KIDDIE MOVIE POLITICALLY CORRECT BUNCH OF AARDVARK COCKSUCKING CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP.... MAY GLADIATOR SWIPE THE HEAD OFF OF AUDIENCES WITH BRUTAL VIOLENT GORE AND MAY IT SHOVE ITS PROVERBIAL SWORD UP THE COLLECTIVE ASS. MAY STARWARS 2 BE A REAL MOVIE AND NOT SOME KIDDIE INFESTED MUPPET MOVIE AND MAY PATRIOT NOT BE SOLVED BY HACKING INTO THE CONFEDERACY WITH A FUCKING LAP TOP COMPUTER CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP CRAP....eh, woah....what a day.. thank you

  • March 7, 2000 1:36 PM CST

    This was hilarious.

    by r_dimitri22

    "No need to conceal my name. I don't really wanna work for Disney anyway. R. -- Raza Syed" Brilliant finish to a good review! I have something to confess. This movie sounds so bad that I am feeling compelled to see it.

  • March 7, 2000 1:40 PM CST

    Oh, and Gilda Mundson...

    by r_dimitri22

    ...in addition to Mike D's recommendations (though I never did see Raising Cain or Blow Out), Scarface is a very good film in my opinion.

  • March 7, 2000 1:45 PM CST

    My thoughts

    by jclin524

    well, I think I'm gonna watch it anyway since the special effects will only be good on a big screen anyway. plus with all the bad reviews out there, I don't have any high hopes for the movie so I shouldn't be disappointed.

  • March 7, 2000 1:53 PM CST

    If We're Talkin' DePalma.....

    by mrbeaks

    Don't forget to check out his best film dealing with telekinesis, THE FURY, which features an excellent score by John Williams, and a truly inspired performance by John Cassavetes.

  • March 7, 2000 2:00 PM CST

    Stoopid Review

    by Shelly

    Okay- that review told me nothing at all. What kind of ramble was that? Better yet, how old was the reviewer? "I didn't like the movie because of that one part where the guy sort of looks up and then turns around and says something...and then the whole thing with the people who were in the same room and walked over and told them to go home and he didn't want to. That was dumb. And then there was the part where the thing climbed up onto that other thing and it just sort of sat there and I wasn't sure what to think. I just looked at my friends and we just stared at each other." Wow- brilliant.

  • March 7, 2000 2:03 PM CST

    Is It True.....

    by mrbeaks

    ..... that Ennio Morricone used Eddie Murphy's "Boogie in Your Butt" as the primary motif for the M2M theme? If true, this movie will be better than the resurrection of Lazarus.

  • March 7, 2000 2:11 PM CST

    No, mr.beaks...

    by monkeylucifer

    It was "She Wants To Party All The Time," certainly one of the single greatest pieces of music craftsmanship to have ever graced the radio waves.....You do know I kidding, right...put down the cleaver..back away slowly....slowly...slowly....that's it, nobody's gonna get hurt...calm down.

  • March 7, 2000 2:14 PM CST

    So bad you have to see it... the new marketing strategy!

    by Funny Ha Ha

    Two of you are now actually ATTRACTED to this movie based upon this negative review. Which represents nearly 10% of the talkback population here. If this movie got 10% of the population of 260 million Americans to see it, that'd be 26 million folks at around $7 apiece or $182 million in revenues!! I think were on to something here!! Come see my sucky, shit-ass movie!! TWO THUMBS DOWN! This thing is so dumb you'll laugh your ass off at how stupid we were to thread the film through our cameras and waste a year of our lives putting it together. The evil, anti-marketing campaign, which if successful lets you laugh at my movies, and me and my slimy industry weasel pals laugh all the way to the bank...

  • March 7, 2000 2:23 PM CST

    Talkbackers don't get it!

    by gilmour

    This review was 100% sarcastic and I thought well written and funny. He's not trying to explain the film its shit! theres the explanation!

  • March 7, 2000 2:26 PM CST

    Love me two times, baby

    by monkeylucifer

    Lord of the X-Dune will suck because the costumes are lame-ass rip-offs of H.R. Puff'nstuf with nipple rings and crotch spikes, and Brian Depalma couldn't direct his way out of damp plastic bag and the Rock is a lame ass excuse to play Bilo and L. Ron Hubbard should have never written it anyways and Queen's soundtrack will suck. There, that should cover it.

  • March 7, 2000 2:42 PM CST

    Two sentence reviews...

    by All Thumbs

    That's what we need. "This movie is shit. Don't go see it unless you plan to make fun of it." OR "This movie is THE shit. Go see it, unless you want to make fun of it."

  • March 7, 2000 2:43 PM CST

    I just want to note...

    by All Thumbs

    That I do not plan on paying money to see this movie. We have a free screening up here tomorrow night. I don't know if I'll stay through the entire movie, maybe I'll just go for the free stuff give-away at the begining.

  • March 7, 2000 3:08 PM CST

    The UK says, Thanks for the warning!

    by Roborob

    See, my rant in the Final Fantasy section is justified, you hav given us warning about a poor movie. But it is Disney and so they will still release it here, however we have been warned. Thank you.

  • March 7, 2000 3:17 PM CST

    Resurrection of Lazarus?

    by Lazarus Long

    You got it! Regarding this DePalma thing, while every film may not suck, I find it hard to support the "good track record" notion. DePalma's career is spottier than a leopard in a paint factory. I don't even know if you can say peaks and valleys...more like bumps and canyons. His best films (Scarface, Body Double, Carrie) are so laden with references to other films and directors (his bad films have them as well) that it's hard to really describe them as truly great, let alone the work of some kind of artistic genius. Really, what is the difference between DePalma and Spielberg, except that Spielberg aims low and hits every time, and DePalma aims high (or acts like he is) and usually misses widely? DePalma should be given a life sentence at the American Film Institute for the unforgivable crime of ripping off Potemkin's baby carriage scene for The Untouchables (which many people still don't know is an outright theft). If this isn't the biggest rape in the history of cinema I don't know what is (okay, maybe the one with the nun in Bad Lieutenant. Ouch.). Raising Cain? An underrated masterpiece? God, don't make me laugh. You know, if I actually thought DePalma was trying to take the piss, I'd have more respect for his work. But any interview reveals him to be so smug and obviously taking himself too seriously. He probably IS trying to go for Kubrick on this thing, and you almost have to feel sorry for the guy in failing miserably. Don't bother trying to shadowbox this cinematic genius, Bri-Guy. You haven't the brain for it. DePalma couldn't do anything on the level of The Shining, let alone 2001.

  • March 7, 2000 3:22 PM CST

    comet was on full house

    by park legend

    tiger was on the brady bunch, and somebody tell me next time when a review contains spoilers, i read this review and not only found out who died, but how and when they died, jeez

  • March 7, 2000 3:36 PM CST

    RoboRob, it's nice that you see the FinalFantasy Allegory!! :p

    by darthpsychotic

    some japanese actually however equate castles, dragons, knights and such, with america for some odd reason! i, like many other americans, actually love the UK for its castles, knights, and its rich history! i'm sure you would like that since myself and other "gen-X-er's" grew up with the british new wave invasion and television(telly?) programs (programmes?) as THE YOUNG ONES, which i watched when i was young and impressionable. unfortunately the current american youth is now growing up on teletubbies, spice girls, and s club 7, although s club 7 actually has yet to take off, thank jesus!

  • March 7, 2000 3:41 PM CST

    The above post was actually meant for the FinalFantasy board!

    by darthpsychotic

    i guess i need to take my medication now.

  • March 7, 2000 3:46 PM CST

    Harry, are you trying to sink this flick?

    by Mystery_Chimp

    O.k., the Chimp of Mystery has seen this movie. It was O.K. It certainly wasn't as bad as some have said. I went thinking I was going to see Star Trek V, after reading these reviews. It's nowhere close. How many negative reviews are you going to post about this movie, Harry? On a scale of 1 to 4 (4=Pay full price, 3=Matinee ticket, 2=Wait for video, 1=Rent it on a 2 for one night and return it unwatched) This movie is a 3. You have to see it on the big screen, but you don't need to pay full price.

  • March 7, 2000 4:00 PM CST

    Mission to mars does suck (ive seen it too)*spoilers*

    by Ravvy

    i went to a screening of it here in tx the other night and personally i thought the movie fuckin blows it was the absolute worst movie by a great cast yes the acting was equivelent to porno yes the alien looks more like of something that would come out of my ass than an alien I nearly got kicked out for laughing so hard in the last thirty min spoiler----- oh yeah forgot to tell ya how life was created a martian sent some of his dna down here and poof theres lifeheh

  • March 7, 2000 4:16 PM CST

    Oh no. Brian De Palms couldn't have made a film this bad. Oh Shi

    by Herman Snerd

  • March 7, 2000 4:40 PM CST

    Lazerous Long

    by The Cars

    De Palma hates The Shining, and he does not wish to be Kubrick, and he did not rape Eisenstein. De Palma's cinema is in dialogue with other films, and he is not trying to put one over on anybody with his film references. He experiments with the concept of memory and dreams on film, and is also a brilliant satirist. Like a scientist, he expands upon themes and cinematic forms that others have touched on. He has shut his ears to those who say he "rips off" others' work, because they choose to not even try to understand it.

  • March 7, 2000 5:47 PM CST

    Darthpsychotic, I still got the message.

    by Roborob

    I did read both sections but what mistifies me is the Japanese ideas on castles and etc, Have the seen too many old Hollywood movies. I associate America with Cowboys, John Wayne, Hollywood, The FBI, FDR, NASA and many other good things.

  • March 7, 2000 7:30 PM CST

    i said it a long time ago

    by mmm_free_wig

    This film needs a talking pie

  • March 7, 2000 8:35 PM CST

    I saw the movie too and it wasn't bad

    by Shadowboy11

    I saw this movie too; at a press screening as the guest of a reviewer for our college newspaper.He liked it and so did I. There are some less than memorable moments, true, but mostly I thought the film was intelligent and thought provoking. Plus, the special effects were great. I can't help but feel that many people are bashing this film just because it is expensive and heavily marketed - a self-described event movie. Isn't that what everybody wants? A big sci-fi film? A reason to go to the movies? Something cool to watch. I question the talkback of everybody who so passionatly hates a film that they have not seen. Do they only want to see films when they can discover them? Do they only want little budgets with shoddy special effects? I don't care if anybody sees this film (I personally have no need to see it again) but it just seems weird that on a site dedicated to the love of movies (are you listening Harry?) and the intelligent discussions of the same, people sink to group think and automatically blast anything (the bigger the better) that comes their way.

  • March 7, 2000 9:32 PM CST

    I'm gonna go turn on "Body Double."

    by METHOS

    Surely one of the most subversive films ever released by a major in the wasteland of the 1980s.

  • March 7, 2000 10:56 PM CST

    MOTHERSCRATCHIN' RIGHT---HE MADE IT ALLLLL WORTHWHILE

    by vealchop

    Thank you, O Mighty Reviewer,Syed, for these words. I had the pleasure of sitting through last night's screening and I have been lamenting the loss of those hours ever since. Your completely unexpected comments were right ON THE FREAKIN' MONEY. I would certainly label this hackneyed mess with the claim "most embarassing film of the new millenium." and if self-punishment is yr thang, then go nuts. Almost has to be seen to be believed. The alien makes Sil in Species look cutting edge. For now and then. This sucks. EXCEPT for one kickass effect where a guy gets sucked up into a Mars cyclone , spins around superfast and splits apart into 50 pieces. THAT WAS RAD.

  • March 8, 2000 4:29 AM CST

    "MTV-Music-Awards-parody bad"

    by Darth Bond

    Although I have no doubts that the reviewer was being honest about the acting in M2M (and that this movie is bad, bad, BAD) I just want to defend MTV parody acting, did you see the MTV parody of seven 5or SE7EN, whatever) starring William Shatner, William Shatner and William Shatner? (he played the parts of kevin, brad and morgan as charcaters he's played in the past; Kirk, hooker, etc). I thought his acting was excellent and very, very funny. So not all MTV parodies have bad acting. Just don't get me started on Academy Award parody acting. CYL.

  • March 8, 2000 1:35 PM CST

    Aw, come on, folks

    by yesfan

    At least keep a neutral opinion until ya see the film. I cannot BELIEVE that reading what someone THINKS about the movie would influence whether or not you see the film. The idea of a critical review is an offer of an opinion from someone who, for whatever reason, feels they know what they are talking about. Operative word here is OPINION which, for all of you who may pose the question, is not a fact, just an idea, a thought. GO AND SEE IT FOR YOURSELVES and then form your OWN opinion. Cripes, its a wonder ANY movie is seen in this country today with all the sheep following the shepherd critics.

  • March 8, 2000 10:48 PM CST

    My take on the feature

    by Sabrecat

    Sigh. Posted under one review, than I find another review I agree with. My apologies for this blatant cut-and-paste: Ok, I'm a student at NorthWestern, home of the B-Fest that was written up here not too long ago. We just had our sneak preview, and on the walk back to our dorms, all we were doing was trying to decide if this was an intentional self-parody or not. I agree with an above post, anyone with a high school level education will have incredible problems watching this movie. It was clearly aimed at a sub-college, possibly even sub-high school demographic. Note the PG rating. The dialogue was absurd, and anything even remotely technical was explained, to the point of adding a flashback to earlier in the movie right before Gary Sinese has an idea--Just in case we didn't get it. This is not a thinking man's movie. On the other hand, the audience laughed uproariously throughout most of the movie. Scenes meant to be white-knuckle-intense are just hilarious. And while the debate is still raging outside my door as to if this is really a comedy, I'm putting my money on not. That doesn't mean we can't enjoy it though. I've been expecting something like this ever since the trailer; "That DNA looks human!" has been my favorite line since the first time I saw it on tv. I enjoyed myself tonight, but there is no way I'd ever pay money to see this film. Finally, the special effects were indeed incredible. Aside from a few scenes which I believe were supposed to look fake (a home video for those who have seen the movie) and a few spacewalk moments where things just didn't look right, this was some quality eye-candy. That's my two cents.

  • March 9, 2000 9:12 PM CST

    Mission to ...?

    by Seany

    I haven't read every person's take on this film but what I have read hasn't dissuaded me from going to see it, everyone has different opinions - someone said that they walked out of Glengary Glen Ross - I thought that film was very good, created a really moody atmosphere. On Mission to Mars, there have been some weird goings on, Mr De Palma has aparently been unavailable for interviews over the last week or so and Touchstone just released a different trailer (I haven't seen it yet but there is a sound file at www.enterprisemission.com) which apparently shows the REAL face on Mars instead of the 'Creative version' so far seen in the earlier trailers. The trailer also goes on about revealing a 25 year old conspiracy.... Very odd...as if Touchstone are 'having a go at Nasa' Anyway, I shall be going tomorrow and I will then be able to post my own views for what they are worth..

  • March 10, 2000 6:15 AM CST

    how bad?

    by newfers

    it's so bad, I hear they killed a cow and filmed it for the movie. Bastards.

  • March 10, 2000 5:06 PM CST

    In space, no one can hear you suck...

    by danhelm

    Actually though, if you listen very carefully, you will hear the sound of several Disney executives facing Eisner's screaming for their lives before the firing squad. I'm sorry, but I love it when I hear that the Mouse House dropped the ball on something.

  • March 10, 2000 7:52 PM CST

    an amazing film

    by Project Mifune

    i haven't laughed like this since i first saw armageddon. oh and check out this guys review on the imdb, i try to share sometimes http://us.imdb.com/Title?0183523

  • March 10, 2000 9:40 PM CST

    Pants Pants Pants Pants Pants Pants

    by Seany

    I have just seen this 120 Million dollar film (did it really cost that much?) I have to declare this film is PANTS! The effects were good. Apart from a really bad one which was the Alien which seemed to have been seeded from the Women Alien out of Mars Attacks - tacky is to kind a word... but I now understand why Mr De Palma went missing when he should have been giving press reviews... It started off ok but after the second crew reached the planet it just got really really bad... I saw Pitch Black recently and although that film was average and didn't leave much of a lasting impression I have to say compared to Mission to Mars it was rather good... oh well, lets hope and pray there is not going to be a sequel....

  • March 11, 2000 12:33 AM CST

    Product Placement...

    by Antrodemus

    It's been awhile since I've seen such heavy handed use of product placement in a movie. I know that it's a necessity in big budget films, but there's a way to do it, and a way not to. I think future shuttle missions should all take clearly labled packages of "Dr.Pepper" to help them find hull breaches.

  • March 11, 2000 11:20 PM CST

    Warning Will Robinson! Danger! Stinker!

    by ZeroFalse

    Inbreeding is never a good idea but that doesn't stop this film from dabbling with DNA. So what happens when you take 2001, Contact, Close Encounters and Robinson Caruso On Mars and do a little gene splicing? This "Worst of Breed" mutt called Mission to Mars. All that's missing are malfunctioning robots to screw things up as the characters insist on doing this themselves. For instance, despite years of high tech training, the mission's genius Captain shoots himself off into space unattached the tether he's holding. He can't hold on of course and like the film itself, falls into the Martian atmosphere to burn up. As for the rest of the movie, you sit there waiting for the other shoe to drop but it never does. At the end, most of the 1/2 filled theater I saw it in started laughing like they'd just been had, making comments like "Is that all there is?". The only story this film doesn't borrow from is Lost in Space, which is a shame, because a robot waving it's arms at the audience yelling "Warning! Danger! Stinker!" would have been most helpful.